The Art of Strengths Coaching

A is for Appreciative Inquiry

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.001

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.002

There are many models for helping people, teams and organisations to develop. Appreciative Inquiry is one of the most effective. It is based on what works.

The approach starts by inviting people to define the particular topic they want to explore. They may choose to focus on topics such as:

How can we work well together?
How can we enable our young people to flourish?
How can we develop successful new products?
How can we tap into the creativity in our organisation?
How can we find solutions that – as far as possible – benefit all the stakeholders?
How can we build a superb organisation?
How can we combine our strengths to build a sustainable community?

People then follow the 4D cycle that goes through the stages of Discovery, Dream, Design and Delivery. In the original model the fourth stage is called Destiny. This is to signify that delivering the goals is more than an end in itself.

David Cooperrider, one of the founders of AI, describes this in the following way.

The Destiny phase represents both the conclusion of the Discovery, Dream, and Design phases and the beginning of an ongoing creation of an ‘appreciative learning culture.’

Different people apply AI in different ways. Whichever approach they use, however, they invite individuals, teams or organisations to build on their positive core.

People clarify the particular area they want to explore. They are then invited:

To clarify when they have performed brilliantly in this area in the past.

To clarify the principles they followed then to perform brilliantly.

To clarify how they can follow these principles – plus maybe add other elements – to perform brilliantly in the future.

This approach can be used with small and big groups. Sometimes it can involve thousands of people. They are asked to share their ideas to help shape the future.

AI has been used by people in all walks of life to tackle challenges in their daily lives, work and communities. People like the approach. They build on when they have performed brilliantly and aim to keep developing.

In my own work I have used elements of it when working with organisations in business. Every time people have applied the approach properly they have delivered success.

As mentioned earlier, David Cooperrider is one of the founders of Appreciative Inquiry. The video below is an excerpt from his contribution to the USAID’s Thought Leaders in Learning Speakers Series.

David explains how AI is translated into action. He focuses on how it can help people, teams and organisations to build on their strengths and achieve their picture of success. You can discover more about his work via the following link.

Philosophy and Background

David helped to pioneer AI in the early 1980s. At that time he was a 24-year-old doing his doctorate and working alongside others doing organisational development work at The Cleveland Clinic.

The traditional approach would have been to focus on the deficits in people’s performance. David was committed to helping people to improve, but he chose to do this by focusing on strengths.

Employees were invited to study their own and other people’s peak performances. People found that revisiting their own successes, for example, ignited their desire to create an even better future.

David and his team had discovered a gold mine. He asked the Clinic’s Chairman, Dr William Kiser, if he could focus totally on this positive approach.

The Chairman encouraged him to go ahead. David and his project supervisor, Suresh Srivastva, would later write:

Human systems grow in the direction of what people study.

Put another way:

What we focus on, we become.

If we study positive solutions, for example, we are more likely to feel optimistic and solve issues. If we study failure, we are more likely to feel despondent.

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.003

This rule proved to be the case at the Cleveland Clinic. The staff loved learning from past successes and wanted to follow these principles in the future. They translated these into tackling specific challenges and producing concrete results.

Diana Whitney also helped to shape the framework that became Appreciative Inquiry. Working with David, she co-authored the first book on the topic called Appreciative Inquiry: A positive revolution in change.

Here is a video in which Diana describes how systems follow the direction that they study. You can discover more about the work done by she and her colleagues via the following link.

Defining The Topic

As mentioned earlier, AI starts by inviting people to clarify the topic they want to explore. It can be useful:

To define the challenge they want to tackle and frame this in a positive way.

To clarify the real results they want to achieve.

This Definition process is one that some people see as the Fifth D in the AI framework. It comes before focusing on Discovery, Dream, Design and Delivery.

“But you can’t frame every challenge in a positive way?” somebody may say.

Some situations are difficult, but this is where AI excels. It is vital to define the topic in a way that inspires people to want to achieve the goal.

Creative people, for example, often frame their challenges in a positive way. They may move from converting the following first statements to the second statements.

How can I stop feeling bad? How can I start feeling good?

How can we stop arguing? How can we, as far as possible, find a win-win?

How can reduce sexual harassment? How can we encourage women and men to work together successfully?

David was actually confronted by this final topic. One day he received a phone call from a consultant who was helping a company to tackle sexual harassment.

During the previous two years the employees had been attending training designed to eliminate this issue. But the levels of sexual harassment were actually increasing, as were the lawsuits against the company.

The consultant in charge of the gender and diversity training asked David:

How would you take an appreciative approach to sexual harassment?

David asked about the real results to achieve. The reply was:

We want to dramatically cut the incidence of sexual harassment. We want to solve this huge problem.

Going deeper, David asked what this would look like. The consultant said:

What we really want is to see the development of a new century organisation – a model of high quality cross-gender relationship in the work place.

Though this wording was somewhat awkward, it clarified a positive picture of success. So eventually the questions posed to people during the following Discovery stage were along the lines of:

When have women and men have worked together successfully in the company? What did they do right then? How can we follow those principles in the future?

The company introduced a small pilot programme on this theme. This exceeded everybody’s expectations.

Hundreds of pairs and teams nominated themselves to provide stories illustrating men and women working together successfully in the company.

Defining the topic is crucial. It creates the framework within which people can channel their positive energy.

Once the topic is chosen, they can then embark on the Discovery part of the AI process. Here are some suggestions people can following for defining the topic.

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.004

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.005


The Discovery phase taps into the positive core – the life-giving forces of a team, organisation or community. AI can be applied in teams or with literally thousands of people. The latter is sometimes called an AI Summit.

AI invites people to discover what works. It explores the stories, strengths and successful patterns already within the system.

Here is a framework that people can follow during the Discovery stage. If appropriate, they can then present their findings back to the whole group.

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.006

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.007

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.008

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.009


Appreciative Inquiry is different from most visioning approaches in a crucial way. It builds on the stories, strengths and successful principles that have already emerged. People are doing several things.

They are building on the organic principles they know work.

They are then more confident about extrapolating these principles into the future.

They see how these principles might be expressed in a picture of success.

People may be dreaming but, because they are following successful principles, they have a belief they can deliver. This is because they have started from within. The dream is organic, rather than something grafted on.

AI practitioners find the Dream and Design parts sometimes start to overlap. This is okay, because there is often a moving forwards and backwards between the two elements.

There are, however, a few things to mention in relation to defining the dream. It can be useful:

To make sure the dream is an expression of the principles that people know have worked already.

To make sure the dream is stimulating, stretching and yet within the scope of the controllables – the things they can control in the situation.

To, if appropriate, invite people to make a picture – or other representation – of them achieving the dream.

People can draw a picture to show what will actually be happening when they reach the goal. They can bring this to life by adding the actual words they want to be hearing from customers, colleagues, the press and other stakeholders. They can then put the picture in a place where they see it each day.

One key point is worth underlining. People who deliver a dream are often positive realists. They have a positive approach, but they are also realistic.

They are a bit like mountain climbers. They focus on achieving a particular goal, but they also do their due diligence. Such people often go through the following stages when testing the validity of their aim.

They clarify the pluses and minuses involved in working towards and achieving the goal. They clarify what it will mean for all the stakeholders.

They clarify how to build on the pluses and minimise the minuses. They clarify whether they are prepared to accept the whole package.

They sometimes do this by asking: “On a scale 0 – 10, to what extent are we really serious about doing what is required to achieve the goal?” They make sure the rating is at least 8+/10.

Here is a framework people can follow during the Dream stage. They can then present these findings to the whole group.

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.010

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.011

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.012

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.013


The Dream is the ‘What’ – the real results to achieve – and the ‘Why’ – the benefits of achieving the goal. The Design is the ‘How’ – the strategies for achieving the goal.

Different people use different approaches to clarifying their strategies. You will, of course, have your own method.

Here is one approach. Bearing in mind the picture of success, people may ask some of the following questions.

What are the key strategies we can follow to give ourselves the greatest chance of success? How can we implement these strategies successfully? What support will people need to deliver success?

What are people’s strengths? How can we build on and co-ordinate these strengths to reach the goal? How can we compensate for any weaknesses?

What are the potential difficulties people may face along the way? How can we anticipate and prevent these difficulties happening? How can we manage the difficulties if they do happen?

How can people encourage themselves on the journey? How can they keep building on what works? How can they find solutions to other challenges? How can people get some quick successes?”

What is the road map – the action plan – for achieving the dream? Who will need to deliver what and by when? What will be the actual things that will be happening that will show we have reached the goal?

Sometimes this calls for radical approaches to redesigning an organisation. David explains:

People are encouraged to ‘wander beyond’ the data with the essential question being this:

‘What would our organization look like if it were designed in every way possible to maximize the qualities of the positive core and enable the accelerated realization of our dreams?’

When inspired by a great dream we have yet to find an organization that did not feel compelled to design something very new and very necessary.

Here is a framework that people can use during the Design stage. They can then, if appropriate, present these findings to the whole group.

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.014

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.015

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.016

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.017

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.018

Delivery – Originally Called Destiny

The Destiny phase translates the dream into reality. People throw themselves into the work and get some early wins.

Maintaining the momentum is crucial, so it is vital to have follow up meetings. One approach is to gather people together at least once a month to report their progress.

If you are running such sessions, keep people’s eyes on the big picture. You can start, for example, by reminding people of the Dream. People can then be invited to present the following things.

The specific things we have delivered in the past month towards achieving the dream.

The specific things we plan to deliver in the next month.

The specific challenges we face and our plans for tackling these challenges.

The specific support we would like to help us to deliver the dream.

The specific other topics we would like to explore regarding how to deliver the dream.

You can encourage people to build on their successes and develop the habit of constant improvement. This will increase the chances of achieving the goal.

Here is a framework that people can use during the Delivery stage. They can then, if appropriate, present these findings to the whole group.

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.019

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.020

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.021

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.022

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.023

Slides Appreciative Inquiry.024

Does AI work? The answer is “Yes.” Starting from the work in Cleveland, it has spread far and wide. Its philosophy has been translated into action in both the commercial and not-for-profit sectors.

You can discover more about the approach at The Appreciative Inquiry Commons. Here is a link to the website.

Finally, here is David talking about how Appreciative Inquiry can help the human family. It is a stimulating approach that provides realistic hope for building a positive future.


    F is for The Fulfilment Model and The Factory Model

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.001

    There are many philosophies about the purpose of life. The philosophy that a person – or a society – embraces influences how they relate to people. This article looks at two different approaches.

    The Fulfilment Model

    This approach aims is to encourage people to fulfil their potential and use their energy to serve others. It may be followed by individuals, schools, teams or organisations.

    Looking back, can you recall a time when you have seen or experienced this approach? You may have been on the receiving end of it when being encouraged by a parent, teacher, coach or other person.

    What did the person or group do to translate the approach into action? They may have aimed to help you to pursue your passion, follow your vocation, build on your strengths or whatever.

    What were the outcomes? How did you feel? What did you do as a result of seeing or experiencing the approach?

    Looking at my own life, for example, I have met many people who have followed this approach. Alec and Mora Dickson were two such people.

    Alec believed that people often showed their best qualities when giving to others. This led him founding Voluntary Service Overseas and Community Service Volunteers. It was CSV that gave me my first opportunity to work with people.

    Alec and Mora

    Leaving school at fifteen, I worked in a factory for six years. Eventually I managed to get a job in an office, but I still wanted to do work that helped people. After a lot of research, I got an interview with CSV.

    Travelling to their office in London in 1967, I had no idea how my life would change. During the visit to Toynbee Hall I had a promising meeting with Elisabeth Hoodless, who was later to lead CSV. Alec then introduced himself to me.

    The things he said struck an immediate chord. He believed that every person had strengths. My lack of education did not matter, he said, because I had something to give.

    Treating me as if I was extremely intelligent, he explained the philosophy behind VSO and CSV.

    “We need to tap into people’s desire to build a better world.

    “I believe that young people have enormous idealism and, at the same time, there are many unmet needs in society.

    “So why not match these two together? We can use the young people’s energy to meet those needs and build a better world.”

    Alec believed that the giver often received as much as the receiver. Why? Our self fades into the background when we are giving, yet we often feel more real afterwards.

    Leaving the meeting, I floated along the pavement. Elisabeth and Alec had promised me they would find a place for me to serve.

    They gave me the opportunity to become a housefather for mentally handicapped children. Since that day I have been fortunate enough to do fulfilling work.

    You may have had your own experience of seeing elements of the fulfilment approach in action. As mentioned earlier, this may have been with a person, school, team or organisation.

    If you wish, try tackling the exercise on this theme. This invites you to do the following things.

    Describe a specific example of when you have seen or experienced the approach.

    Describe the specific things that people – a person or group – did to translate the approach into action.

    Describe the specific outcomes that happened as a result of this experience.

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.002

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.003

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.004

    The Factory Model

    This approach aims is to encourage people to go through the factory and use their energy to serve the economy. It may be followed by individuals, schools, teams or organisations.

    Many people are familiar with this approach. It is implemented by societies and organisations that see human beings as economic units.

    There is little point in adding to the critiques of this approach. Many describe how schooling has replaced education, for example, with an industrial model.

    The Factory Model falls down, however, when aiming to nurture people with what are called 21st Century Skills. These are the Four Cs: Critical Thinking, Creativity, Collaboration and Communication. People and organisations need such skills to thrive in a fast changing world.

    You may have seen or experienced the factory approach in action. It may have been applied by individuals, teachers, managers, organisations or whatever.

    If you wish, try tackling the exercise on this theme. This invites you to do the following things.

    Describe a specific example of when you have seen or experienced the approach.

    Describe the specific things that people – a person or group – did to translate the approach into action.

    Describe the specific outcomes that happened as a result of this experience.

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.005

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.006

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.007

    The Fulfilment Model
    In The Future

    Looking to the future, can you think of any situations where you might like to encourage people to fulfil their potential and serve others?

    You may wish to do this as a parent, teacher, coach, manager or whatever. Alternatively, you may wish to create something that helps people to translate their ideals into action.

    Nick Askew is somebody who has taken this step. He created Conservation Careers. This is a website that enables people to find work in which they can help wildlife to flourish.

    Here is an excerpt from the website. You can discover more via the following link.

    Conservation Careers

    We believe that all wildlife is beautiful, and that it deserves great conservationists working to protect it.

    We have an extensive international knowledge, experience and network of contacts within the conservation career sector.

    This means that we can help job seekers and conservation organisations to form lasting relationships.

    We do this by providing careers advice and information to a network of dedicated conservationists across the globe.

    Nick has built a huge resource for people who want to follow their passion. The website lists opportunities all across the world. These include jobs in the following fields.

    Climate Change … Communications … Ecological Consultancy … Environmental Economics … Environmental Education … Fundraising & Development … Information & Data Management … Mapping & Geographic Information Systems … Marine Conservation … Marketing.

    Organisational Management … Ornithology … Photography and Filmmaking … PhDs … Policy & Advocacy … Post-Doctorate Work … Programme Management … Project Management … Ranger Work … Science & Research … Warden Work.

    Different people choose different ways to follow the fulfilment approach. If you wish, try tackling the exercise on this theme. This invites you to do the following things.

    Describe a specific example in the future when you may want to encourage people – a person or group – to fulfil their potential and serve others.

    Describe the specific things you can do to follow this approach.

    Describe the specific outcomes that may happen as a result of you following this approach.

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.008

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.009

    Slide Fulfilment Model and Factory Model.010


      A is for Altruism

      This article provides an introduction to Altruism. It explores how people express kindness when faced by challenges.

      Samuel and Pearl Oliner have devoted much of their lives to studying humanity at its best. Their Read more


        G is for Don Greene: Helping People To Perform Under Pressure

        Don helps performing artists, athletes and others to perform at their best – even when under pressure. A deeply compassionate person, his work embodies the qualities of profound simplicity.

        Many people will have heard Read more


          L is for The Learner Learns What The Learner Wants To Learn

          There are many philosophies about how people learn. A key principle that underlines most approaches, however, is that:

          The learner learns what the learner wants to learn.

          Looking back at your own life, can Read more


            F is for Roger Fisher: His Work On Negotiation

            Roger Fisher made a great contribution to peace. Known for his books on negotiation such as Getting To Yes, his obituary in the Economist described him as a ‘lawyer, teacher and peacemaker.’

            Read more


              P is for Making Physical, Psychological and Philosophical Changes

              Imagine you are a leader who wants to transform a culture. How can you get some early wins on the road to delivering success? One approach is to learn from individuals who make changes Read more


                C is for Kathleen Cushman: Fires In The Mind

                Kathleen’s work complements that of many great educationalists who have supported the positive spirit in young people. Here are two reactions to her book Fires In The Mind.

                This inspiring book helps Read more


                  P is for Practical Application

                  “I buy into the approach you describe, but that is not what I buy from suppliers,” one Managing Director told me in the early 1990s.

                  “What I buy is the application that produces results.”

                  Read more


                    R is for Carl Rogers: The Person Centered Approach

                    Carl’s name is known to everybody who has done a counselling course. Today it is hard to realise how revolutionary his ideas were in the 1930s and 40s.

                    In the video above Carl describes Read more